Monday, October 13, 2008

Another Iraq-Hawk for Obama

Christopher Hitchens -- the noted chain-smoking Atlantic Monthly contributor and critic of figures as diverse as Henry Kissenger and Mother Theresa -- came out for Obama today. Well, it seems more like he came out against McCain/Palin:
On "the issues" in these closing weeks, there really isn't a very sharp or highly noticeable distinction to be made between the two nominees, and their "debates" have been cramped and boring affairs as a result. But the difference in character and temperament has become plainer by the day, and there is no decent way of avoiding the fact. Last week's so-called town-hall event showed Sen. John McCain to be someone suffering from an increasingly obvious and embarrassing deficit, both cognitive and physical. And the only public events that have so far featured his absurd choice of running mate have shown her to be a deceiving and unscrupulous woman utterly unversed in any of the needful political discourses but easily trained to utter preposterous lies and to appeal to the basest element of her audience. McCain occasionally remembers to stress matters like honor and to disown innuendoes and slanders, but this only makes him look both more senile and more cynical, since it cannot (can it?) be other than his wish and design that he has engaged a deputy who does the innuendoes and slanders for him.

I suppose it could be said, as Michael Gerson has alleged, that the Obama campaign's choice of the word erratic to describe McCain is also an insinuation. But really, it's only a euphemism. Anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear had to feel sorry for the old lion on his last outing and wish that he could be taken somewhere soothing and restful before the night was out. The train-wreck sentences, the whistlings in the pipes, the alarming and bewildered handhold phrases—"My friends"—to get him through the next 10 seconds. I haven't felt such pity for anyone since the late Adm. James Stockdale humiliated himself as Ross Perot's running mate. And I am sorry to have to say it, but Stockdale had also distinguished himself in America's most disastrous and shameful war, and it didn't qualify him then and it doesn't qualify McCain now.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

You're right, "erratic" is a euphemism here. Relevant to your Post-Boomer theme, are you aware of the actual post-Boomer generation which real generation experts generally say Obama is a part of? It's Generation Jones--born 1954 to 1965, between the Boomers and Xers.

I strongly recommend a new video which has a ton of top pundits (e.g. Clarence Page, David Brooks, Karen Tumulty, Howard Wolfson, Michael Barone, Dick Morris, etc.) discussing the fact that Obama is a Joneser, and the surprisingly large role of GenJones in this election, the video is 5 minutes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk

Christopher Walker said...

Thanks for the comment. Indeed, I've discussed the GenJones video here:

http://postboomer.blogspot.com/2008/10/generational-transfer-of-power.html

I apologize if I otherwise wear my GenX status on my sleeve ;-)